Back to Blog

Cola vs AutoPod: Which Podcast Editor Wins?

If you're editing podcasts in Adobe Premiere Pro, you've probably come across AutoPod. It's been a popular choice for automating multi-camera edits. But there's a new contender that's changing the game: Cola. Let's break down how these two tools compare.

What They Have in Common

Both Cola and AutoPod are native Premiere Pro plugins designed to automate podcast editing. They both handle multi-camera switching based on who's speaking, and they both aim to save you hours of tedious cutting. But that's where the similarities end.

Feature Comparison

Feature Cola AutoPod
Multi-cam editing ✓ Up to 10 cameras ✓ Up to 10 cameras
Speaker detection ✓ Up to 10 speakers ✓ Multi-speaker
AI viral clip detection ✓ Included ✗ Not available
Auto reels creation (9:16) ✓ With face centering ● Basic social clips
AI transcription & captions ✓ Built-in ✗ Not available
Face auto-centering ✓ Automatic ✗ Manual reframe
Snap-zoom emphasis ✓ AI-timed ✗ Not available
Pricing model Pay-per-use credits $29/month subscription
Free features ✓ Manual reels, Podcast multi-cam ✗ Trial only

Where Cola Pulls Ahead

1. AI-Powered Viral Clip Detection

This is the biggest differentiator. AutoPod can help you create social clips, but it doesn't analyze your content to find the best moments. Cola's AI listens to your entire podcast and identifies segments with strong hooks, emotional peaks, quotable phrases, and high-energy delivery. It's like having a social media producer built into your editing software.

2. Automatic Face Centering

When creating vertical reels, keeping the speaker's face centered is crucial. Cola automatically detects and tracks faces, keeping them perfectly framed in the 9:16 format. With AutoPod, you're stuck manually adjusting the reframe for each clip.

3. Dynamic Snap-Zoom Effects

Cola adds professional snap-zoom cuts at key moments—automatically timed to emphasis points in the audio. These subtle zoom effects are what separate viral content from amateur clips. AutoPod doesn't offer anything comparable.

4. Integrated Captions

With Cola, transcription and captions are built right in. You get word-level timestamps, an interactive editor, and multiple export formats including stylized MOGRT graphics. AutoPod focuses solely on multi-cam—you'll need a separate tool for captions.

5. Fairer Pricing

AutoPod charges $29/month regardless of how much you use it. Cola uses a credit system where you only pay for AI features when you use them—and podcast multi-cam editing is completely free. If you're not editing every single day, Cola is significantly more economical.

Where AutoPod Still Works

AutoPod has been around longer and has a solid reputation for reliable multi-cam editing. If all you need is basic camera switching without any AI clip detection or caption features, and you edit podcasts daily, the flat subscription might work for you.

AutoPod also includes a jump cut editor for removing silences—useful for solo talking-head videos. Cola focuses more on the podcast and social content workflow.

The Verdict

For podcasters who want to maximize their content's reach on social media, Cola is the clear winner. The AI viral clip detection, automatic face centering, and integrated captions create a complete podcast-to-reels pipeline that AutoPod simply can't match.

If you only need basic multi-cam switching and nothing else, AutoPod works fine. But for creators who understand that repurposing content is just as important as creating it, Cola offers dramatically more value.

Ready to Upgrade Your Podcast Workflow?

Try Cola's podcast multi-cam editing free. No credit card required.

See Pricing